Hello, first of all: many thanks for publishing the beta/development snapshots. It's great to have possbility to test the latest development version.
I've identified several bugs in the latest development snapshot (Aug 23, 2006): - a bug in gist/exceptions/GistMessageParseException.cpp: missing header - two compilation errors on gcc 4.1.0: extra prefixes in gist/fsm/GistFsmBase.h and gist/message/GistErrorMessage.h - my own bug in nslp/nslp_api/NslpApi.cpp: getSockets() should not clean rfds, so FD_ZERO should be moved to waitForSignal()
All the above mentioned bugs are fixed in the attached patch. If you agree, could you please apply it to your development tree?
thanx and regards Petr
Hi,
Thanks for the patch. I applied it to the development tree and it will show up in the next development version.
BTW: Are there any features you are really missing in the implementation?
Christian Dickmann
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:01:23 +0200, "Gotthard, Petr" petr.gotthard@siemens.com wrote:
Hello, first of all: many thanks for publishing the beta/development snapshots. It's great to have possbility to test the latest development version.
I've identified several bugs in the latest development snapshot (Aug 23, 2006):
- a bug in gist/exceptions/GistMessageParseException.cpp: missing
header
- two compilation errors on gcc 4.1.0: extra prefixes in
gist/fsm/GistFsmBase.h and gist/message/GistErrorMessage.h
- my own bug in nslp/nslp_api/NslpApi.cpp: getSockets() should not
clean rfds, so FD_ZERO should be moved to waitForSignal()
All the above mentioned bugs are fixed in the attached patch. If you agree, could you please apply it to your development tree?
thanx and regards Petr
BTW: Are there any features you are really missing in the implementation?
Basically, we are missing the NTLP/GIST features that are described in the IETF draft, but "currently not supported". Currently the most missed functionality is the SendMessage timeout. In some of the previous versions the GIST_LOOSEEND_MRM has not been fully implemented, but this may be fixed in nsis-0.4.x.
Best regards, Petr
nsis_imp@informatik.uni-goettingen.de